Антитезы и антиномии в переводных литургических текстах Древней Руси

Шумило Светлана

doi:10.36124/rt.2022.22

Published: 2023-05-291

Vol. 64 No. 3 (2022)

Antitheses and antinomies in translated liturgical texts of Ancient Russia

Шумило Светлана

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2633-284X

https://doi.org/10.36124/rt.2022.22

Abstract

Translated Slavic hymnography, like the original Byzantine hymnography, contains a large number of antitheses and antinomies, which, obviously, are one of the most important poetic features of liturgical texts. In our opinion,
these poetic means served as a model for many original Slavic works, therefore, the study of antitheses and antinomies in translated hymnography is an important task of medieval studies, in particular, literary criticism. The
article deals with the most striking antitheses and antinomies of the Sunday, Christmas, and Passion services.

Download files

PDF (Русский)

Citation rules

Светлана , Ш. (2023). Antitheses and antinomies in translated liturgical texts of Ancient Russia. Theological Yearbook, 64(3), 601. https://doi.org/10.36124/rt.2022.22

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Antiteza.” 1925. W Literaturnaâ ènciklopediâ: Slovar` literaturnyh terminov. V 2-h t. T. 1: A–P. Pod red. Nikolaâ Leont´eviča Brodskogo.

Moskva; Leningrad: Izdatel`stvo L.D. Frenkel`: 33.

„Antiteza.” 1962. W Kratkaâ literaturnaâ ènciklopediâ. Тom 1. Pod. red. Alekseâ Aleksandroviča Surkova, 1088. Moskva: Sovetskaâ ènciklopediâ.

Averincev, Sergej Sergeevič. 2004. Poètika rannevizantijskoj literatury. Sankt Peterburg: Azbuka-klassika.

Glazunova, Ol`ga Igorevna. 1998. „Paradoks kak princip organizacii teksta.” Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta 3: 39–49.

Mineâ prazdničnaâ. Rukopis´. Nacional´naâ Biblioteka Ukrainy imeni V. Vernadskago, Fond I, № 7494. XV v.

Mineâ, dekabr`. Rukopis´. Rossijskaâ gosudarstvennaâ biblioteka, sobranie Troice-Sergievoj lavry, Fond 304 I, № 504. XV v.

To mēnaion dekambrios. Tēi ke’ tou autou mēnos dekembriou. Dostęp 2020.12.10. http://glt.goarch.org/texts/Dec/Dec25.html.

Oktoih, glas 5. Rukopis´. Nacional´naâ Biblioteka Ukrainy imeni Vernadskago, Fond 30I, № 340. XV v.

Ostapczuk, Jerzy. 2018. „Liturgičeskie osobennosti v strukture rukopisnyx evangelij soborno-prixodskogo bogosluženiâ iz afonskix monastyrskix xraniliŝ” Slovo 68: 289-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31745/s.68.9

Roždestvenskaâ, Tat`âna Vsevolodovna. 2004. „Novonajdennye drevnerusskie nadpisi-graffiti Martir`evskoj paperti Novgorodskogo sobora.” Тrudy otdela drevnerusskoj Literatury 55: 536–548.

Skaballonovič, Mihail Nikolaevič. 2008. Tolkovyj tipikon. Moskva: Izdatel`stvo Sretenskogo monasty`râ.

Tofiluk, Jerzy. 2020. „Miłosierdzie Boże w tekstach Triodionu Postnego.”Rocznik Teologiczny 62 (4): 1245-1261.

Triod` cvetnaâ. Rukopis´. Rossijskaâ gosudarstvennaâ biblioteka, sobranie Troice-Sergievoj lavry, Fond 304 I, № 399. XVI v.

Zozul´ak, Ján. 2018. Inquiries into Byzantine Philosophy. Berlin: PeterLang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b14585

Zozul´ak, Ján. 2021. „The influence of Greek Spirituality on Russian Culture.” Religions 12(7): 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070455